The recent call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin resulted in only a partial agreement rather than a full ceasefire in Ukraine. Several key factors contributed to this outcome.
First, Russia agreed to a 30-day pause on attacks targeting Ukrainian energy infrastructure but refused to extend the ceasefire to broader military operations. This limited agreement means fighting continues in other areas.
Second, Putin set preconditions for a full ceasefire, demanding that Ukraine halt its military buildup and end foreign military aid—conditions Ukraine considers unacceptable.
Third, both sides continue to engage in military operations. Ukraine has reported Russian missile strikes, while Russia claims Ukrainian attacks on its positions, eroding trust and undermining any ceasefire attempts.
Additionally, the agreement lacks clear enforcement mechanisms, leading to differing interpretations and accusations of violations. Some analysts suggest Russia’s move is strategic, allowing it to strengthen its military positions while appearing open to peace talks.
Ultimately, without mutual trust and clearer terms, the call failed to achieve a comprehensive ceasefire, leaving Ukraine’s conflict unresolved.
