White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has sparked controversy with her blunt remarks about ongoing protests in Portland, Oregon, declaring that demonstrators are not peacefully protesting but are instead “there to cause mayhem and havoc.”
The statement came during a fiery White House press briefing, where Leavitt defended the administration’s decision to deploy federal agents and National Guard troops to several U.S. cities experiencing unrest. She rejected the notion that the Portland protests represented legitimate political expression, framing them instead as criminal acts disguised as activism.
“They’re not in Portland to peacefully protest,” Leavitt said firmly. “They are there to cause mayhem and havoc. There’s a big difference between free speech and violent destruction.”
White House Defends Federal Intervention
Leavitt’s comments followed reports of violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement, including arson, property damage, and attacks on police officers. She insisted that federal intervention was necessary to “restore law and order” where local authorities had, in her words, “failed to protect their own citizens.”
When pressed by reporters about whether local leaders had formally requested federal help, Leavitt accused the media of “ignoring the facts on the ground.” She cited numerous incidents of vandalism and said the administration would not hesitate to step in where “chaos overrides governance.”
The press secretary also hinted that the federal government may cut funding to states or cities that “allow anarchy to take hold,” echoing previous statements made by President Trump regarding sanctuary cities and law enforcement funding.
Backlash and Political Fallout
Leavitt’s statements have drawn sharp criticism from civil rights advocates and state officials in Oregon, who accused the White House of inflaming tensions and criminalizing dissent. Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler and Oregon Governor Tina Kotek both reaffirmed that the majority of demonstrators have been peaceful, accusing federal forces of escalating violence through heavy-handed tactics.
Political analysts say Leavitt’s remarks reflect a broader strategy by the administration to frame the protests as lawlessness rather than political activism — potentially paving the way for expanded federal authority in urban security matters.
“The administration is using rhetoric designed to justify federal overreach,” said one political science expert. “By labeling protesters as violent agitators, they shift the narrative from free speech to public safety.”
A Nation on Edge
The Portland protests, which began as demonstrations over civil rights and government accountability, have reignited national debates over the balance between public order and free expression. With tensions mounting, Leavitt’s comments underscore the deep political divide surrounding how America defines protest — and how far federal power should reach to contain it.
As Portland braces for more demonstrations, one thing is clear: the fight over who controls the narrative — protesters or the White House — is far from over.
Watch video below :
