U.S. Confirms Gaza Ceasefire Deal Has No Full Israeli Withdrawal Clause

🇺🇸 State Dept. Clarifies: No Israeli Pullout Required in New Gaza Ceasefire Plan

During a recent press briefing, a U.S. State Department spokesperson confirmed that the newly proposed Gaza ceasefire agreement does not include a provision requiring Israel to fully withdraw its troops from Gaza. This clarification came after a reporter directly asked whether the plan obligates an Israeli pullout from the region.

The spokesperson stated that the deal, brokered through diplomatic channels including Qatar and Egypt, focuses primarily on a temporary ceasefire, hostage-prisoner exchanges, and expanded humanitarian access—not an end to Israel’s military presence in Gaza.

🔍 Key Elements of the Ceasefire Proposal

 

• Temporary truce: Expected to last 60 days, the ceasefire aims to pause hostilities long enough to facilitate humanitarian efforts and ongoing negotiations.

 

• Hostage exchange: The proposal includes the release of dozens of Israeli hostages in exchange for over 1,000 Palestinian detainees. Remaining hostage releases would be phased in later stages.

 

• Humanitarian aid: The plan would allow 500+ aid trucks per day into Gaza to address the worsening humanitarian crisis.

 

• Military repositioning: Israel would redeploy troops away from densely populated areas, but the agreement does not mandate a full withdrawal from Gaza.

🧭 What Happens Next?

 

• The proposal has been delivered to Hamas for review. While early reports indicate potential interest, Hamas continues to demand a permanent ceasefire and full Israeli withdrawal as a condition for any long-term agreement.

 

• Israeli officials are currently in Washington ahead of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s scheduled meeting with President Trump on July 7, where ceasefire terms are expected to be discussed further.

 

• The U.S. continues to push for a diplomatic breakthrough, emphasizing the humanitarian urgency while avoiding political red lines for either party.

🗣️ Reactions & Implications

 

• Pro-Israel factions support the limited pullback, arguing it ensures security while allowing humanitarian relief.

 

• Pro-Palestinian advocates criticize the plan for failing to address core issues like occupation and long-term sovereignty.

 

• International observers warn that without clear steps toward a lasting solution, the ceasefire may simply delay further escalation.

📌 Bottom Line:
The U.S. confirms that the current ceasefire framework does not require Israel to exit Gaza entirely, focusing instead on short-term relief and negotiation leverage. With both sides under pressure and stakes high, the proposal represents a fragile diplomatic window—but not yet a path to permanent peace.