In March 2025, President Donald Trump launched actions against several top law firms, accusing them of undermining his administration. The move has drawn sharp criticism from legal experts and political figures, raising concerns about constitutional violations and government overreach.
Law Firms in Trump’s Crosshairs
- Perkins Coie LLP: Trump signed an executive order barring federal agencies from using the firm’s services and revoking security clearances for its attorneys. The order cited Perkins Coie’s role in funding the Steele dossier during the 2016 election.
- Paul Weiss: The administration imposed similar restrictions on Paul Weiss due to former partner Mark Pomerantz’s involvement in past investigations against Trump. The order was later rescinded after the firm agreed to provide $40 million in pro bono services to the government.
- Covington & Burling: Lawyers at this firm lost security clearances for representing former Special Counsel Jack Smith in cases against Trump.
Backlash and Legal Challenges
Perkins Coie has filed a lawsuit challenging Trump’s executive order. A federal judge temporarily blocked most of its provisions, warning that such actions could have a chilling effect on the legal profession. Legal experts argue that targeting firms based on their past cases may violate First Amendment protections.
Congress and Business Fallout
The administration has also pressured Republican senators to scrutinize businesses working with these firms. Some firms, like Paul Weiss, have sought to comply with the administration’s demands to avoid further penalties.
As lawsuits and political battles unfold, Trump’s aggressive stance against major law firms is shaping up to be a historic confrontation over legal independence and executive power.
