As the Israel–Iran war enters a volatile second week, U.S. President Donald Trump made headlines with a bold declaration: “Israel’s doing well in terms of war.” His comment, delivered during a press conference in New Jersey, reinforced the view that the United States will not push for a ceasefire while Israel maintains military dominance.
This statement not only reflects Trump’s alignment with Israeli strategic goals but also signals a clear U.S. policy of non-intervention—for now.
“It’s very hard to tell someone to stop when they’re winning,” Trump explained. “Let’s see how the situation evolves over the next two weeks.”
Trump Signals Support for Israeli Offensive
Trump’s remarks came as Israeli forces ramp up airstrikes targeting Iran’s missile infrastructure and nuclear development facilities, while Iran continues its retaliatory barrage of drones and ballistic missiles aimed at Israeli cities. With civilian casualties rising, many global leaders are urging restraint. However, Trump argues that Israel must be allowed to capitalize on its battlefield advantage to ensure long-term security.
The president reaffirmed that a ceasefire is not off the table, but any decision will be based on “how things develop on the ground.” Trump’s two-week evaluation window suggests a deliberate, wait-and-see approach rather than immediate diplomatic engagement.
Rejecting European Diplomacy
At the same time, European leaders, including officials from Germany, France, and the U.K., convened in Geneva in an attempt to revive negotiations with Iran. Iran’s leadership, however, firmly rejected these overtures—insisting that talks will only proceed with the U.S. once Israeli attacks stop.
Trump criticized the European effort, stating:
“Iran doesn’t want to speak to Europe… they want to speak to us.”
This comment not only reflects the central role Washington plays in Middle East diplomacy, but also Trump’s belief that American leadership is crucial to resolving the crisis—if and when it is time to negotiate.
Intelligence Clash: Trump vs. Gabbard
The president also reignited tensions within his own administration by disputing intelligence reports presented by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who claimed Iran remains months away from a viable nuclear weapon. Trump contradicted this, suggesting Iran could reach nuclear capability in weeks, justifying Israel’s aggressive military posture.
Global Impact and Strategic Risks
Trump’s support for Israel’s offensive adds pressure on Iran-backed militias in Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon, increasing the risk of a broader regional conflict. Meanwhile, global oil markets remain volatile, with Brent crude prices rising sharply amid fears of supply disruption in the Persian Gulf.
Conclusion
As Israel’s war with Iran intensifies, Trump’s strong endorsement of Israel’s military efforts—combined with his resistance to ceasefire diplomacy—marks a pivotal moment in U.S. foreign policy. With a two-week decision window, the world watches to see whether Trump will eventually intervene diplomatically—or allow the conflict to escalate further.
