Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick sparked outrage after suggesting that only “fraudsters” would complain if Social Security checks were delayed. He cited his 94-year-old mother-in-law as an example, implying that most seniors wouldn’t mind interruptions in their payments.
Backlash and Concerns
Lutnick’s remarks faced immediate criticism, as Social Security supports nearly 69 million Americans, many of whom rely on it for essential expenses like food, rent, and healthcare. Advocacy groups argue that his statement ignores the financial struggles of retirees and vulnerable individuals.
Political and Public Reaction
Critics see this as a sign of the administration’s disregard for Social Security’s importance. The controversy has reignited debates over the future of the program and whether the government is committed to protecting seniors’ financial security.
