Washington, D.C. — President Donald Trump declared victory in the fight against crime in the nation’s capital as the federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officially ended after 30 days. The move returns policing authority to local officials but leaves behind a heated debate about federal power, local autonomy, and the future of public safety in Washington.
🚨 Federal Takeover Ends
Trump had invoked Section 740 of the Home Rule Act in early August, citing a surge in violent crime, carjackings, and homicides across the District. Under the emergency order, control of the MPD shifted from the mayor to federal authorities, supported by the National Guard and multiple federal agencies.
On September 10, 2025, the order expired, and Chief Pamela Smith resumed full command of the city’s police force. While the bulk of federal personnel have withdrawn, some National Guard units and ICE agents remain in support roles.
📉 Trump Claims “Spectacular” Results
At a press briefing, Trump praised what he called a “law-and-order success story,” highlighting a dramatic decline in crime during the federal intervention. According to city data, carjackings dropped 87%, and overall violent crime saw a sharp reduction compared to previous months.
“This was a spectacular turnaround,” Trump said. “We restored order, saved lives, and showed America what strong leadership looks like.”
⚖️ Criticism and Legal Challenges
Despite Trump’s celebration, the intervention was highly controversial. Civil rights groups, immigration advocates, and local leaders accused the administration of overreach, arguing that the use of federal troops undermined the District’s Home Rule.
Community organizations also reported that the presence of ICE officers created fear among immigrant families, discouraging crime victims and witnesses from cooperating with police. Lawsuits were filed challenging the constitutionality of deploying military forces for local policing, and several cases remain pending in federal court.
🏛️ Congress Eyes Long-Term Changes
The end of the emergency order does not mean the debate is over. Congressional Republicans have already announced plans to introduce new legislation targeting D.C. crime policies, including lowering the age for adult prosecution, tightening bail standards, and expanding federal oversight powers.
Democrats, meanwhile, argue that D.C. residents deserve greater autonomy, not less, and are preparing to resist efforts to roll back Home Rule.
🔍 A Divided Legacy
For supporters, the federal takeover proved that tough enforcement can bring crime under control. For critics, it set a dangerous precedent by sidelining local government and eroding trust in communities most affected by violence.
As Washington regains local control of its police, the city faces a pivotal question: how to sustain lower crime rates without compromising democratic accountability and civil rights.
