Supreme Court Backs Trump Policy Restricting Gender Markers on U.S. Passports
In a deeply divisive ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has given the Trump administration permission to enforce passport restrictions that require gender markers to match a person’s sex assigned at birth, rather than their gender identity. The decision, issued on November 6, 2025, temporarily overturns lower court orders that had blocked the policy earlier this year.
The move immediately affects transgender and nonbinary Americans, who will no longer be able to select an “X” gender marker or self-identify as male or female unless it aligns with the biological sex listed on their birth certificate.
The policy, first introduced under Trump’s executive order in early 2025, directs all federal agencies to recognize only two biological sexes — male and female — in official documentation.
The Court’s Decision and Divided Opinions
The 6–3 ruling came after the Justice Department filed an emergency request arguing that the State Department should retain authority over how passports are issued as part of its foreign-affairs power.
Conservative justices agreed, stating that the rule falls within the executive branch’s administrative discretion. The Court’s liberal members, however, issued a sharp dissent, arguing that the order “inflicts needless harm on Americans whose government documents now deny their identity.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote:
“This policy effectively erases the existence of transgender and nonbinary citizens from official records — a harm that is both profound and immediate.”
Background: A Policy Reversal
Under the Biden administration, the State Department introduced the “X” gender marker option in 2021, allowing U.S. passport holders to select male, female, or nonbinary identifiers without medical documentation.
That policy was celebrated as a milestone for gender inclusivity. However, Trump’s Executive Order 14168, signed in January 2025, reversed those changes — directing federal agencies to base gender identification solely on biological sex at birth.
Civil rights groups immediately sued, calling the order discriminatory and unconstitutional. A lower federal court had blocked the policy in June, but the Supreme Court’s latest move reinstates it while litigation continues.
Human Rights Advocates React
Advocacy organizations, including the ACLU and Lambda Legal, condemned the decision, warning that it places transgender and nonbinary individuals at risk of harassment and misidentification, especially when traveling internationally.
“This ruling strips away dignity and safety from thousands of Americans,” said an ACLU spokesperson. “Your passport should reflect who you are — not what politicians want you to be.”
Travel experts also note that affected travelers may now face delays, denials, or inconsistencies when applying for new or renewed passports.
What Comes Next
While the ruling does not settle the issue permanently, it allows the Trump administration’s policy to take effect until lower courts complete their review. Legal experts say the case could eventually return to the Supreme Court for a full hearing on the constitutional questions involved.
In the meantime, millions of transgender and nonbinary Americans must use passports that no longer reflect their true identity — a decision that critics call both politically motivated and deeply personal.
Watch video below :
