Russia Endorses Trump’s New Security Strategy, Calling It Aligned With Moscow’s Vision

Russia has publicly applauded President Donald Trump’s newly released national security strategy, describing the document as largely consistent with Moscow’s own geopolitical vision. The unexpected praise marks a significant rhetorical shift and has sparked a wave of global reactions, ranging from cautious optimism to sharp alarm.

The strategy, unveiled last week, outlines the Trump administration’s long-term approach to global competition, alliances, and military posture. Notably, it avoids labeling Russia as a direct threat—breaking with decades of U.S. policy—and instead presents Moscow as a potential partner in restoring what the document calls “strategic stability.” This recalibration immediately drew attention in the Kremlin.

Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov hailed the plan as “highly aligned with Russia’s perspective on today’s world order.” According to Peskov, the document reflects a “more realistic and balanced view” of global affairs, particularly in its emphasis on cultural identity, national sovereignty, and skepticism toward expansive alliances. For Moscow, these themes echo long-standing Russian positions and may signal a chance for reduced tensions with Washington.

The Kremlin’s warm response highlights several elements in the strategy that mirror its own narratives—especially concerns about Europe’s “civilizational decline,” the questioning of traditional Western institutions, and a renewed focus on great-power pragmatism. Russia also welcomed language encouraging diplomatic engagement on nuclear stability, arms control, and regional security issues.

However, the reaction from the international community has been far more divided. European officials and security analysts warn that the doctrine appears heavily influenced by Moscow’s worldview, raising fears that Washington may be distancing itself from its traditional allies. Critics argue the shift could weaken NATO cohesion, undermine Western support for Ukraine, and embolden authoritarian regimes who view the U.S. as stepping back from its democratic-values-based foreign policy.

Within the United States, debate is growing across both political parties. Supporters of the new strategy argue that it represents a necessary realignment that prioritizes national interest over ideological commitments. They claim the document reflects a sober understanding of geopolitical realities and creates opportunities to manage competition with Russia through dialogue rather than endless confrontation.

Opponents counter that the strategy risks sending the wrong message at a delicate moment in global politics. They warn that embracing Moscow’s framing could complicate sanctions policy, weaken U.S. leverage in Eastern Europe, and fuel distrust among long-standing American allies.

As Washington absorbs the broad implications of the new doctrine, one question looms: Will the rhetoric lead to real policy changes or closer cooperation between the United States and Russia? For now, the Kremlin’s enthusiastic endorsement suggests that Moscow sees the document as a potential turning point. Whether it brings greater stability—or greater instability—remains uncertain as the global landscape adjusts to this bold strategic shift.

Watch video below :