Nearly Eight Years Later, Trump Admits Using ‘Shithole Countries’ Remark

Nearly eight years after the controversy first erupted, President Donald Trump has publicly confirmed that he did in fact use the phrase “shithole countries,” reviving a debate that once dominated headlines and fueled discussions about race, immigration, and presidential conduct. His admission has reignited political tensions, prompted renewed criticism, and sparked fresh analysis of the lasting impact of the remark on U.S. foreign relations.

The original controversy surfaced in 2018, when reports claimed that Trump used the phrase during a closed-door White House meeting on immigration policy. According to multiple attendees, Trump questioned why the United States should accept immigrants from what he described as “shithole countries,” allegedly referencing Haiti, El Salvador, and several African nations. At the time, Trump denied the wording, calling the reports “made-up” and insisting he used tough but appropriate language.

Now, in a recent interview, Trump acknowledged making the remark, adding that he stood by his broader criticism of U.S. immigration policy. His confirmation has drawn swift and intense reactions across the political spectrum. Critics say the admission validates concerns about racially charged rhetoric and its influence on public policy, while supporters argue that Trump is simply reaffirming a blunt, unfiltered communication style that appeals to his base.

Political analysts note that the timing of Trump’s admission is significant, especially amid heightened debate over immigration, border security, and U.S. diplomacy. By confirming the comment, Trump has reopened one of the most polarizing moments of his presidency, raising questions about how his rhetoric continues to shape domestic politics and global perceptions of the United States.

Human rights groups and international leaders have also weighed in, emphasizing that the original remark—and now its confirmation—damaged America’s moral standing. Several foreign officials recalled the anger and disappointment sparked in their nations, with some calling the phrase disrespectful and harmful to long-standing partnerships. Diplomats warn that such language, even years later, can influence global perceptions of U.S. values and priorities.

Domestically, lawmakers have responded predictably along party lines. Democratic leaders renewed their criticism of Trump, arguing that his comments reflect an outdated, discriminatory mindset that undermines America’s identity as a nation of immigrants. They also point to the broader consequences of political rhetoric on social cohesion and multicultural communities. Republican allies, meanwhile, have largely downplayed the admission, framing it as a moment of candor rather than controversy.

Despite the renewed attention, Trump’s comments highlight a broader issue that extends beyond a single phrase: the power of presidential language. Experts note that the words of a U.S. president carry immense weight, capable of influencing diplomatic relations, immigration policies, and national dialogue. Trump’s confirmation serves as a reminder of how political rhetoric can echo long after it is spoken, shaping narratives and public memory.

As the political world reacts to this latest development, the lasting impact of the remark continues to unfold. Whether viewed as offensive, honest, or simply characteristic of Trump’s approach, the phrase—and the confirmation nearly eight years later—remains a defining moment in contemporary American politics.

Watch video below :