White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has publicly defended President Donald Trump’s 28-point Ukraine peace plan, challenging critics to consider its contents before passing judgment. The plan, which has drawn widespread attention from the international community, proposes a framework intended to resolve the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
In a recent briefing, Leavitt described the plan as balanced and mutually beneficial, arguing that it could create a pathway for peace that serves the interests of both Ukraine and Russia. While she emphasized her confidence in the plan’s fairness, she declined to release detailed provisions, citing the sensitive nature of negotiations and the need for discretion. “[The plan] is designed to work for both sides,” she said, urging media and analysts to review the text rather than rely on speculation.
The announcement comes amid criticism from politicians and analysts who argue that the plan could involve concessions that may be detrimental to Ukraine. Leavitt countered such claims, framing the plan as a pragmatic approach to conflict resolution that prioritizes diplomatic engagement over unilateral action or escalation. Her insistence that critics “read the plan” underscores a media strategy focused on transparency through engagement, rather than reactive commentary.
Experts note that Leavitt’s remarks serve multiple purposes. First, they defend Trump’s foreign policy initiative by positioning it as constructive and realistic. Second, they seek to shift public discourse away from partisan criticism and toward substantive analysis of the proposal’s contents. By doing so, the White House aims to create an environment where debate is informed by the plan itself rather than incomplete or second-hand information.
The 28-point plan reportedly covers a range of proposals, including territorial agreements, security guarantees, economic reconstruction, and phased withdrawals. While the full text has not been publicly disclosed, media outlets such as the Financial Times and Politico have summarized key elements, highlighting controversial areas such as territorial settlements in contested regions. Leavitt emphasized that each provision is designed with stability and fairness in mind, and that misinterpretation by critics could hinder the chances of a negotiated settlement.
Leavitt’s approach also reflects the broader challenge of managing international perception. With allies in Europe and partners in Kyiv closely monitoring any proposed resolution, the administration’s public messaging is crucial. By urging careful consideration of the plan, Leavitt seeks to influence both domestic opinion and international reception, demonstrating that the proposal is serious, detailed, and aimed at sustainable peace.
While questions remain about the feasibility of implementation, Leavitt’s statements highlight the administration’s commitment to positioning the plan as a legitimate diplomatic effort. Her insistence on careful review signals a strategy that emphasizes reasoned debate over reactionary critique, encouraging policymakers, media, and the public to engage with the substance of the proposal rather than assumptions or political rhetoric.
As global attention remains focused on the conflict in Ukraine, Leavitt’s defense of the 28-point peace plan underscores the administration’s efforts to frame the discussion around constructive dialogue and measured analysis, rather than partisan or sensationalized responses.
Watch video below :
