Judges Blast DOJ for Repeatedly Listing Suspended Attorney Lindsey Halligan

Federal judges sharply criticized the U.S. Department of Justice this week after discovering that Lindsey Halligan — an attorney suspended from practicing law — was still being listed on official court documents. The rebuke, delivered in a tense courtroom exchange, has prompted renewed scrutiny of the agency’s internal procedures and its handling of attorney records in high-profile cases.

According to court officials, Halligan’s name appeared on multiple filings despite her suspension being publicly documented and communicated to the Justice Department months earlier. Judges expressed frustration that the DOJ continued to submit legal paperwork identifying her as an active attorney involved in ongoing litigation. The oversight, they said, raised serious concerns about accuracy and professional responsibility within one of the nation’s most powerful law-enforcement institutions.

One judge called the repeated listings “inexcusable,” noting that court records must reflect only authorized attorneys to maintain procedural integrity. Another judge described the lapse as “a systemic failure,” questioning how many other documents may have included outdated or inaccurate information. The judges emphasized that even clerical errors can have significant consequences in federal cases — from delaying proceedings to jeopardizing legal validity.

The controversy comes at a time when public confidence in institutional accountability is already fragile, making the DOJ’s misstep all the more damaging. Legal analysts say the situation underscores the importance of rigorous administrative oversight, particularly in cases involving sensitive political or national-security matters. When attorney credentials are misstated, they argue, it undermines both transparency and the standard of professionalism expected from federal prosecutors.

The Justice Department responded by acknowledging the error and pledging an immediate internal review. In a brief statement, the DOJ said the listings were the result of an “administrative oversight” and assured the court that Halligan would be removed from all future filings. Officials also confirmed that updated records have been distributed to all teams involved in the cases where her name previously appeared.

Still, judges remained unconvinced that the explanation fully addressed the underlying issue. They pressed the DOJ on how such a lapse occurred in the first place — particularly given the visibility of Halligan’s suspension and her well-known involvement in politically sensitive legal matters. Some judges suggested that the problem may point to broader structural weaknesses in case-management practices, prompting calls for expanded auditing and stricter verification protocols.

Legal experts note that although the error is unlikely to affect the outcome of ongoing cases, the optics are deeply problematic. Halligan’s name carries political weight due to her previous work for President Donald Trump, and any procedural irregularity involving her immediately attracts heightened public attention. Even minor administrative mistakes, analysts warn, can fuel allegations of carelessness or bias within the DOJ.

Advocacy groups are now urging the Justice Department to adopt more transparent reporting practices, arguing that accountability must extend beyond correcting errors after the fact. They say federal agencies have an obligation to ensure that court documents — foundational to the justice system — are accurate, updated, and free from misrepresentation.

As the DOJ’s review begins, judges have made it clear they expect swift corrective action. The incident has become a stark reminder that even the smallest procedural failures can cast long shadows over the integrity of federal institutions, especially in an era where public scrutiny is constant and political stakes remain high.

Watch video below :