On October 15, 2025, dozens of journalists working at the Pentagon returned their access badges and exited the building, rejecting new reporting rules issued by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The rules mandate that reporters sign an agreement promising not to publish any unclassified information without prior Pentagon approval. Violations could result in badge revocation and being classified as a security threat.
Major news organizations, including The New York Times, CBS News, and Fox News, refused to comply, arguing that the rules undermine press freedom and restrict transparency. Reporters warned that limiting access to the Pentagon would make it harder to provide timely and accurate coverage of military and defense matters.
The administration defended the new policy as a measure to manage what it called a “disruptive press,” with President Trump publicly supporting the rules as a way to control sensitive information and protect national security. Critics, however, said the policy effectively censors reporting and erodes the media’s watchdog role.
This mass exit represents a major rupture in the relationship between the Pentagon and the press. Journalists emphasized that they plan to continue covering defense matters from outside the Pentagon, but noted that lack of direct access could hinder real-time reporting and reduce accountability of the military and government operations.
The only outlet that agreed to the new rules was One America News Network (OANN), allowing its journalists to remain inside the Pentagon. Other media organizations criticized this decision, suggesting it may reflect favoritism toward a network aligned with the administration.
This situation underscores ongoing tensions between the U.S. government and the media over information control, transparency, and freedom of the press. It raises important questions about the limits of government authority in regulating reporting and the rights of journalists to access public institutions in a democracy.
Experts warn that such policies could set a dangerous precedent if allowed to stand, potentially restricting independent reporting across other federal agencies. Meanwhile, journalists continue to seek alternative ways to cover Pentagon activities and maintain oversight despite the restrictions.
As the debate unfolds, the Pentagon press corps’ mass exit highlights the critical role of media independence and the challenges that arise when government policies clash with constitutional freedoms.
Watch video below :
