The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has reportedly launched an internal review of its own handling of a mortgage fraud investigation involving Senator Adam Schiff, highlighting ongoing concerns about political interference and procedural irregularities. The review comes after reports that key officials allegedly pushed for scrutiny of Schiff, raising questions about the impartiality of the probe.
The investigation initially centered on potential mortgage fraud, with former DOJ official Ed Martin and Federal Housing Finance Agency head Bill Pulte playing prominent roles. Sources suggest that these individuals may have influenced or encouraged aspects of the investigation beyond normal DOJ procedures. The internal review aims to determine whether any unauthorized actions occurred, including whether non-DOJ personnel were improperly “deputized” to assist in the case.
As part of the ongoing scrutiny, a federal grand jury in Maryland has issued a subpoena to Christine Bish, a Republican congressional candidate, requesting her communications with Martin, Pulte, and others allegedly involved in the investigation. The subpoena specifically references the mortgage fraud probe involving Senator Schiff, indicating that prosecutors are seeking to clarify the extent of outside influence on DOJ operations.
Reports indicate that the Schiff investigation has stalled, with DOJ prosecutors unable to find sufficient evidence to pursue charges. This has raised concerns that the probe may have been influenced by political motivations rather than solid legal grounds. Critics argue that the involvement of partisan actors could undermine the credibility of the Justice Department, particularly in high-profile cases targeting public officials.
Senator Schiff has consistently denied any wrongdoing. In response to the scrutiny, he has established a legal defense fund to prepare for potential litigation and to reinforce public confidence in his conduct. Legal analysts suggest that the DOJ review could have broad implications, not only for the Schiff case but also for the integrity of federal investigations involving political figures.
The review reflects growing concerns about politicization of the Justice Department, a topic that has drawn attention during multiple administrations. Observers note that improper influence over an investigation — whether through external actors or DOJ insiders — can erode public trust in federal law enforcement and lead to legal challenges. The department’s findings will be closely watched for any indication of procedural violations or lapses in oversight.
As the DOJ continues its internal assessment, questions remain about the full scope of involvement by external parties, the influence of political motivations, and the future of the stalled mortgage fraud case. The outcome of the review could shape how the department handles politically sensitive investigations in the future, underscoring the importance of maintaining transparency, impartiality, and adherence to legal norms in all federal probes.
Watch video below :
