The November 26, 2025 shooting near the White House — allegedly carried out by an Afghan immigrant — has thrust U.S. refugee and asylum vetting practices back into the spotlight. The incident, which left two members of the National Guard critically wounded, has triggered an immediate suspension of immigration processing for Afghan nationals and prompted a sweeping review of asylum cases approved in recent years.
According to officials at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the agency will now treat applicants’ countries of origin as a “negative discretionary factor” during vetting. That includes assessing whether a home country can reliably produce identity documents and whether it is considered “high-risk.” The new guidance, announced just a day after the shooting, applies to all new and pending immigration requests from citizens of 19 “countries of concern,” among them Afghanistan.
The suspected shooter, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, is said to have entered the U.S. under a 2021 evacuation program and been granted asylum in 2025 — following what past statements described as standard vetting procedures. But in the light of the attack, critics argue that prior processes were insufficient. Several lawmakers and security officials have raised concerns that the vetting standards during mass resettlements may have been relaxed or rushed — allowing potential security risks to slip through.
In response, the administration — led by Donald J. Trump — ordered a full-scale reevaluation of refugee and asylum applications approved since 2021 under the previous administration. The review also extends to many green-card holders from countries deemed high risk.
The broader implications are profound. Organizations advocating for refugees warn that millions of people seeking safety — many of whom fled conflict zones or worked alongside U.S. forces — may now face renewed uncertainty, delays in processing, or even rejection.
Leaders of refugee-support groups have urged Americans to distinguish between one individual’s alleged violent act and entire communities of displaced people. As #AfghanEvac emphasized, “one individual’s actions should not define an entire group.”
Still, the political fallout has been swift. Critics of past immigration policy claim this incident proves that prior vetting was dangerously lax, while human-rights advocates warn the response risks fueling xenophobia, broad-brush hostility, and unfair scrutiny of innocent refugees.
As the investigation into the D.C. shooting unfolds, the U.S. government’s approach to refugee intake and asylum adjudication appears poised for a major overhaul — one that may reshape the balance between national security and humanitarian commitment for years to come.
Watch video below :
