In a fiery speech on the Senate floor, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced a controversial amendment to the sweeping “One Big Beautiful Bill,” targeting what he called “left-wing overreach” in artificial intelligence regulation. Cruz didn’t hold back—calling out California Governor Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and referring to Harvard professor Mahmood Mamdani as “Comrade Mamdani.”
The proposed amendment would place a 10-year federal moratorium on state and local regulation of AI. It also includes a financial penalty: $500 million in federal broadband and AI development funding would be withheld from any state or municipality that enacts its own rules on AI.
“We will not let the Newsoms, Basses, or Comrade Mamdanis of the world dictate the future of American innovation,” Cruz declared. “We need one standard—not fifty.”
🧠 The Fight Over AI Policy
Cruz argued that allowing individual states to regulate AI would create a fragmented legal landscape, hinder tech development, and drive innovation overseas. He accused Democratic leaders and progressive academics of “peddling fear” and pushing “ideological conformity dressed as ethics.”
His amendment comes amid growing concern on both sides of the aisle over AI’s impact on everything from employment and surveillance to data privacy and national security. But Cruz’s bill focuses less on oversight and more on shielding developers from what he views as “bureaucratic strangulation.”
⚖️ Critics Push Back
Democrats strongly oppose the amendment. Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) called it a “dangerous overreach” that strips communities of their right to protect citizens from AI misuse, including facial recognition bias and data exploitation. Civil rights groups echoed those warnings, noting that state-level protections are often stronger and more responsive than federal ones.
Even some Republicans are skeptical. Senators Josh Hawley, Marsha Blackburn, and Ron Johnson have expressed concern that the amendment undermines states’ rights—a long-held conservative principle.
“We shouldn’t be handing over tech governance to unelected federal regulators while muzzling our local leaders,” said Hawley.
🏛️ Legislative Status
Despite controversy, Cruz’s amendment advanced in the Senate, tied to a broader tech infrastructure funding package. A vote is expected in the coming days. If it passes, the full “Big Beautiful Bill” will head back to the House, where some lawmakers—like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene—say they were unaware of the AI amendment when they initially voted for the bill.
🔍 What’s at Stake
-
Federal vs. State Control: The amendment would give Washington exclusive power over AI regulation—removing authority from governors and mayors.
-
Big Tech Backing: Industry giants support Cruz’s plan, preferring one national standard over a web of conflicting state laws.
-
Political Messaging: Cruz’s speech was as much about energizing conservative voters as it was about shaping AI policy.
🧭 Final Word
Sen. Ted Cruz’s explosive remarks—and his AI moratorium amendment—have sparked a fierce national debate over the future of technology governance. With innovation, privacy, and political power on the line, the Senate now finds itself at the center of the battle for AI’s next frontier.
