Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has announced that he will neither veto nor sign the city’s newly approved budget, allowing it to take effect without his formal endorsement. The unusual decision underscores ongoing tensions between the mayor’s office and the City Council, while ensuring that Chicago avoids a potentially disruptive fiscal standoff.
Under city law, a budget passed by the City Council can still become official without the mayor’s signature, provided it is not vetoed. By choosing this path, Johnson is signaling dissatisfaction with key elements of the spending plan while stopping short of blocking it outright.
In a statement, the mayor said the budget includes important investments but also reflects compromises he believes fall short of his administration’s priorities. Johnson emphasized that refusing to sign the budget should not be interpreted as opposition to keeping city services running. Instead, he framed the move as a reflection of unresolved disagreements over fiscal strategy, public safety spending, and long-term financial sustainability.
The budget, approved after weeks of debate, allocates billions of dollars across public safety, education, infrastructure, and social services. City Council members supporting the plan argued it strikes a necessary balance between funding essential services and avoiding tax increases that could further burden residents. Critics, however, say it does not go far enough in addressing structural budget gaps and rising pension obligations.
Mayor Johnson had previously raised concerns about certain provisions, including limits on funding flexibility and the absence of new revenue measures he believes are needed to stabilize Chicago’s finances. By declining to sign the budget, the mayor is making a political statement while avoiding the fallout that could follow a veto, which would have sent the spending plan back to the council and potentially delayed city operations.
City Council leaders welcomed the mayor’s decision not to veto the budget, saying it provides certainty for city departments as the new fiscal year approaches. “While we may not agree on every detail, the most important thing is ensuring continuity of services for Chicagoans,” one alderperson said.
Political analysts say the move reflects the complex dynamics at City Hall, where the mayor must navigate competing demands from progressive allies, moderate council members, and residents concerned about taxes and public safety. Allowing the budget to take effect without a signature gives Johnson room to distance himself from unpopular elements while avoiding responsibility for potential disruptions.
The decision may also shape upcoming negotiations over future budgets. By publicly withholding his endorsement, Johnson is signaling that deeper reforms and new revenue discussions are likely ahead. Observers expect the mayor to push for changes in the next budget cycle, particularly around long-term debt, pension funding, and investments in community programs.
For now, Chicago’s government will continue operating under the approved budget, providing stability for city workers and residents alike. However, the mayor’s refusal to sign the plan highlights persistent divisions over how best to manage the city’s finances and priorities.
As Chicago moves forward, the episode serves as a reminder that even when a budget is finalized, political and fiscal debates at City Hall are far from over.
Watch video below :
