Nicolás Maduro stunned a U.S. federal courtroom on Monday by declaring that he is still the legitimate president of Venezuela, even as he pleaded not guilty to a sweeping set of criminal charges brought by U.S. prosecutors.
Appearing before a federal judge in Manhattan, the former Venezuelan leader rejected the authority of the court and questioned U.S. jurisdiction over his case. Speaking through an interpreter, Maduro asserted that he remains Venezuela’s head of state and described his arrest as an unlawful act carried out by foreign forces.
Maduro faces multiple charges, including drug trafficking, narco-terrorism, and weapons-related offenses, allegations that U.S. officials have pursued for years. Prosecutors accuse him of leading a criminal network that allegedly collaborated with armed groups to flood the United States with illegal narcotics. Maduro has consistently denied these claims, calling them politically motivated.
In court, Maduro formally entered a not guilty plea, setting the stage for a high-profile legal battle that is expected to test international law, diplomatic norms, and the limits of U.S. criminal jurisdiction over foreign leaders. His defense team argued that Maduro is entitled to immunity as a sitting president, a claim that U.S. prosecutors firmly dispute.
The courtroom appearance followed Maduro’s dramatic capture during a U.S. military operation in Caracas, an event that has triggered global controversy. Washington has defended the operation as lawful and necessary, citing long-standing indictments and national security concerns. Critics, however, argue that the move risks destabilizing the region and undermining international legal principles.
Despite being in U.S. custody, Maduro maintained a defiant posture. He reportedly described himself as a “lawfully elected president” and insisted that Venezuela’s sovereignty had been violated. His statements echoed messages broadcast to supporters back home, where political tensions remain high amid uncertainty over the country’s leadership.
The case has drawn sharp reactions worldwide. Some governments and international organizations have expressed concern over the precedent set by prosecuting a foreign leader captured abroad. Others have welcomed the proceedings, viewing them as a long-overdue attempt to hold powerful figures accountable under international criminal standards.
Legal experts say the trial could hinge on whether U.S. courts recognize any form of presidential immunity for Maduro, especially given Washington’s position that he no longer holds legitimate authority. The issue recalls past cases involving foreign leaders, though few have unfolded under circumstances this dramatic.
Maduro’s next court hearing is scheduled for later this year. Until then, he will remain in U.S. custody as both sides prepare for what could become one of the most consequential international criminal trials in modern history.
As the legal process unfolds, the case is expected to continue dominating headlines, reshaping U.S.–Latin America relations, and fueling debate over sovereignty, justice, and the reach of American courts beyond their borders.
Watch video below :
