Thailand Rejects Trump’s Ceasefire Claim, Signals Continued Fighting
Thailand has vowed to continue military operations after US President Donald Trump claimed a ceasefire had been reached, creating confusion and renewed tension surrounding the ongoing conflict. Thai officials moved quickly to dismiss Trump’s statement, insisting that no ceasefire agreement exists and that fighting remains active.
Speaking to local media, senior Thai government and military officials said operations would continue until national security objectives are fully met. “There is no ceasefire,” one official stated bluntly. “Thailand will continue to defend its sovereignty.”
Trump’s Claim Sparks Confusion
Trump’s comments, shared publicly, suggested that diplomatic efforts had successfully paused hostilities. However, Thai authorities said they were not consulted and had not agreed to any such arrangement.
The discrepancy immediately raised questions about the accuracy of Trump’s claim and the role of unofficial or parallel diplomatic channels. Analysts noted that unilateral ceasefire announcements without confirmation from all parties often deepen mistrust rather than ease tensions.
Thai Military: Operations Ongoing
Thailand’s military leadership confirmed that active operations are continuing, citing ongoing security threats and unresolved clashes. Officials emphasized that any ceasefire would require formal negotiations, clear terms, and mutual verification — none of which have occurred.
Military spokespeople stressed that the situation remains fluid and warned civilians to stay alert in affected areas. The government also reaffirmed its commitment to protecting national borders and internal stability.
Political and Diplomatic Fallout
The incident has drawn attention both domestically and internationally, with political observers warning that premature or inaccurate ceasefire claims can undermine diplomatic credibility.
Thai lawmakers criticized the statement as irresponsible, arguing that false expectations of peace could place civilians and troops at risk. “Announcing peace when there is none is dangerous,” one parliamentarian said.
Meanwhile, foreign policy experts said the episode highlights the challenges of modern conflict diplomacy, where public statements can rapidly shape — or distort — reality on the ground.
International Reactions and Regional Stability
Regional partners and international organizations have urged restraint, calling on all sides to pursue verifiable diplomatic solutions. However, Thailand’s firm response suggests that any path toward de-escalation remains uncertain.
Security analysts warn that mixed messaging could increase the risk of escalation, particularly if armed groups or opposing forces interpret ceasefire claims as tactical pauses rather than binding agreements.
Conclusion
Thailand’s decision to keep fighting after rejecting Trump’s ceasefire claim underscores the fragile and complex nature of modern conflict resolution. As officials insist that no agreement exists, the gap between political rhetoric and battlefield reality has once again come into sharp focus.
Until formal negotiations take place and all parties publicly confirm a ceasefire, Thailand’s leadership has made one position clear: the fight is not over.
Watch video below :
