US Military Launches 22nd Strike on Suspected Drug Vessel in Pacific

The United States military has executed its 22nd strike on a suspected drug-trafficking vessel, escalating a controversial campaign that has reshaped Washington’s approach to international narcotics operations. The latest incident occurred in the eastern Pacific Ocean, where U.S. forces targeted a fast-moving boat allegedly linked to a designated terrorist organization and a major drug-smuggling network. According to defense officials, the Thursday operation resulted in the deaths of four men aboard the vessel.

A video released by U.S. Southern Command shows the small craft accelerating through open waters moments before a precision strike engulfs it in a fiery explosion. The Pentagon claims the strike was based on intelligence indicating the boat was transporting illicit narcotics along a well-known trafficking corridor frequently used by transnational criminal groups. This operation marks another chapter in an increasingly aggressive campaign that blends counterterrorism tactics with anti-narcotics enforcement — a shift raising alarm among legal experts, human-rights organizations, and foreign governments.

The strike is part of Operation Southern Spear, launched in September 2025 and expanded rapidly across the Caribbean and into the eastern Pacific. With this latest attack, at least 87 people have been killed across 22 operations, many of which involved vessels believed to be smuggling cocaine or other narcotics toward Central America and the United States. Supporters argue that the campaign disrupts dangerous drug routes and applies long-overdue pressure on powerful trafficking networks. But critics warn the United States is setting a troubling precedent by treating suspected drug traffickers as military targets rather than criminal suspects.

Concerns intensified after earlier investigations revealed that one strike in September included a second attack that allegedly killed survivors who had already been thrown into the water — an act described by lawmakers as potentially unlawful and morally indefensible. These revelations have fueled debate over whether the Pentagon is adhering to international humanitarian law, which forbids extrajudicial killings and requires combatants to distinguish between legitimate military threats and unarmed individuals who pose no immediate danger.

Additionally, officials have yet to release key evidence, such as the identities of the individuals killed or verification of narcotics found onboard targeted vessels. Multiple governments in Latin America have demanded transparency, claiming that their nationals may have been among the victims and questioning America’s authority to conduct lethal operations in international waters absent direct threats.

Despite mounting scrutiny, the U.S. Department of Defense maintains that the strikes are lawful and necessary to curb increasingly militarized drug-smuggling operations. Pentagon leaders argue that traffickers linked to designated terrorist organizations operate with combat-level weaponry and pose an elevated risk to regional stability.

As the United States continues its high-stakes maritime campaign, global attention is increasingly focused on the legal, ethical, and geopolitical consequences. Each new strike intensifies debate over the future of international anti-narcotics policy — and whether the line between law enforcement and military engagement is being erased at sea.

Watch video below :