A political firestorm erupted this week following the leak of a private phone call between U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and senior Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov—a conversation many analysts have since described as “bonkers” due to its startling tone and geopolitical implications. The recording, first published by Bloomberg, reveals Witkoff giving strategic advice to a top aide of Vladimir Putin on how to present a potential peace proposal for the war in Ukraine.
According to the leaked transcript, Witkoff encouraged Ushakov to craft a message that would appeal directly to President Donald Trump, suggesting that Moscow should frame itself as the party “seeking peace” and avoid inflammatory rhetoric if it hoped to persuade Trump to endorse their approach. Witkoff allegedly recommended that Russia open its pitch with personal praise for Trump, referring to him as “a man of peace,” before broaching any territorial discussions—an idea that stunned many in Washington.
The leak triggered immediate condemnation across the U.S. political spectrum. Several lawmakers accused Witkoff of showing undue favoritism toward Russia, with critics arguing that a U.S. envoy advising a Kremlin official on how to influence an American president represents a severe conflict of interest. Representative Ted Lieu stated bluntly that “Steve Witkoff was supposed to work for the United States, not Russia,” while other officials raised questions about whether national security protocols were violated.
In Moscow, the reaction was fiercely defensive. Ushakov insisted the leak was “unacceptable” and claimed it amounted to an act of hybrid warfare intended to sabotage diplomatic efforts between the United States and Russia. The Kremlin has not confirmed the authenticity of the full transcript, though Russian officials acknowledged the call did take place. Some Kremlin insiders suggested the leak could have resulted from surveillance on platforms such as WhatsApp, which are sometimes used for informal exchanges.
The controversy arrives at a highly sensitive moment in global diplomacy. With the war in Ukraine grinding on, the possibility of back-channel negotiations has become increasingly contentious. Analysts warn that the leaked call could undermine trust among key international partners and complicate any future peace efforts, especially if U.S. officials appear divided in their approach.
President Trump, for his part, defended Witkoff, characterizing the envoy’s comments as part of the “art of the deal.” Trump argued that navigating conversations with world leaders requires flexibility, adding, “He’s got to sell this to Ukraine. He’s got to sell Ukraine to Russia.” Critics, however, saw the remark as evidence of the blurred lines between diplomacy, politics, and personal loyalty that have surrounded the Trump-era foreign policy team.
The fallout continues to grow as congressional leaders call for investigations, foreign governments voice concern, and media outlets dissect every detail of the leaked exchange. With accusations ranging from poor judgment to potential national security breaches, the incident stands as one of the most explosive diplomatic leaks of the year—one that could reshape the landscape of U.S.–Russia relations and the broader Ukraine peace process.
Watch video below :
