Former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been sentenced to death in absentia by the country’s International Crimes Tribunal, marking one of the most dramatic turning points in the nation’s modern political history. The ruling, delivered on November 17, 2025, found Hasina guilty of multiple charges linked to the 2024 student-led uprising that escalated into a nationwide revolt. The decision has sparked intense debate about justice, political motivations, and the future stability of Bangladesh.
The Charges Against Hasina
The tribunal convicted Hasina on three major counts:
-
Ordering violent crackdowns that resulted in mass casualties
-
Inciting attacks on protesters
-
Failing to prevent widespread atrocities committed under her leadership
Prosecutors presented audio recordings and testimonies alleging that Hasina authorized the use of lethal weapons during the 2024 unrest. The uprising, initially sparked by student protests, grew into large-scale demonstrations against her long-standing government. According to international monitoring groups, hundreds—and possibly more than 1,000—people lost their lives during the crackdown.
Alongside the death sentence, Hasina also received a life imprisonment term for additional charges related to abuse of power and human rights violations. Several former top officials in her administration were also convicted, intensifying the political shockwaves the verdict has created.
Hasina’s Response and Ongoing Exile
Hasina, who fled to India after being ousted from power, has dismissed the tribunal as illegitimate and politically driven. She has called the verdict a “complete distortion of justice,” arguing that the interim government is using the legal system as a tool of retribution.
Her party, the Awami League, has condemned the ruling and described it as an attempt to “erase political opposition.” Hasina’s family has stated that they will only consider an appeal if the political environment becomes safe and democratic participation is guaranteed.
Reactions Inside and Outside Bangladesh
The interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, welcomed the decision, framing it as a historic step toward accountability. Officials claim the verdict demonstrates that no leader is above the law, regardless of power or influence.
International reactions, however, are mixed. Human rights organizations have raised concerns about fair-trial standards and the use of the death penalty, urging Bangladesh to reconsider capital punishment in politically sensitive cases. The United Nations expressed support for justice efforts but warned against rushing legal processes that could fuel further unrest.
A Turning Point for Bangladesh
The sentencing of a former prime minister—especially one who ruled for more than a decade—signals a dramatic shift in Bangladesh’s political landscape. As tensions rise and questions mount about potential extradition from India, the country faces a volatile period marked by uncertainty, public division, and growing global attention.
This unprecedented verdict may shape Bangladesh’s future for years to come, influencing everything from political reform and civil liberties to regional diplomacy and international human-rights debates.
Watch video below :
