White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered a sharp response to comments made by Jack Schlossberg, grandson of President John F. Kennedy, who publicly criticized his cousin, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., calling him a “rabid dog” for serving in the Trump administration.
Schlossberg, who recently launched his campaign for New York’s 12th Congressional District, made the remarks during an MSNBC interview. He accused Kennedy Jr. of spreading misinformation and described his service in the Cabinet as a “dangerous alignment” with President Donald Trump. “My cousin RFK Jr. is there barking, spreading lies and misinformation,” Schlossberg said, framing his critique in starkly personal and political terms.
Leavitt, speaking at the White House briefing, dismissed Schlossberg’s comments as “ridiculous” and defended Kennedy Jr.’s record. “Secretary Kennedy is doing an outstanding job in the Cabinet, bringing transparency and scientific rigor to the Health and Human Services Department,” she said, reinforcing the administration’s support for his work.
The confrontation highlights a rare public rift within the Kennedy family, whose members have long been viewed as symbols of American political legacy. While internal disagreements have existed for years, Schlossberg’s decision to openly denounce his cousin in a major news interview marks a notable escalation.
Political observers note the timing: Schlossberg’s congressional campaign launch coincided with the remarks, potentially increasing his national visibility but also drawing attention to family divisions. Meanwhile, the White House response demonstrates a strategic effort to defend Kennedy Jr. without prolonging the dispute. By labeling the criticism “ridiculous” and affirming his work, Leavitt sought to neutralize the comments while maintaining focus on policy accomplishments.
The feud touches on broader political and public health debates. Schlossberg specifically cited concerns about Kennedy Jr.’s positions on vaccines and other health policies, calling them “misguided and harmful.” In contrast, the administration portrays Kennedy Jr. as a dedicated public servant contributing positively to national health priorities.
Experts suggest that this public clash could influence both Schlossberg’s campaign and Kennedy Jr.’s political standing. While the remarks may energize some voters seeking a break from family legacy politics, they also risk alienating others who value the Kennedy name and its historical significance.
For now, the White House’s firm rebuttal appears to have stemmed the immediate controversy. Yet, the story underscores the complex dynamics of family, politics, and public perception—a combination that continues to shape American political discourse.
As Schlossberg’s campaign progresses and Kennedy Jr. continues in his Cabinet role, the family feud may remain a recurring topic, attracting media attention and influencing both personal and political narratives in the months ahead.
Watch video below :
